the (obsolete) standard allows either 0 or 1 for the decimal point
location in this case, but since the number of zero digits returned in
the output string (in this implementation) is one more than the number
of digits the caller requested, it makes sense for the decimal point
to be logically "after" the first digit. in a sense, this change goes
with the previous commit which fixed the value of the decimal point
location for non-zero inputs.

these functions are obsolete and have no modern standard. the text in
SUSv2 is highly ambiguous, specifying that "negative means to the left
of the returned digits", which suggested to me that 0 would mean to
the right of the first digit. however, this does not agree with
historic practice, and the Linux man pages are more clear, specifying
that a negative value means "that the decimal point is to the left of
the start of the string" (in which case, 0 would mean the start of the
string, in accordance with historic practice).

these odd names are actually generated by mess in glibc's stdlib.h, so
any glibc-linked program using strtol needs them to run against musl.

this is a cheat since the _l versions take an extra argument, but
since these functions are only here for ABI purposes, it doesn't
really matter as long as the ABI matches. if the non-__-prefixed
versions are eventually made public, they should proabably be real
functions rather than hacks like this.

this header evolved to facilitate the extremely lazy practice of
omitting explicit includes of the necessary headers in individual
stdio source files; not only was this sloppy, but it also increased
build time.

now, stdio_impl.h is only including the headers it needs for its own
use; any further headers needed by source files are included directly
where needed.

to deal with the fact that the public headers may be used with pre-c99
compilers, __restrict is used in place of restrict, and defined
appropriately for any supported compiler. we also avoid the form
[restrict] since older versions of gcc rejected it due to a bug in the
original c99 standard, and instead use the form *restrict.

not heavily tested but these functions appear to work correctly