the kernel mq_attr structure has 8 64-bit longs instead of 8 32-bit
longs.

it's not clear that this is the nicest way to implement the fix, but
the concept (translation) is right, and the details can be changed
later if desired.

until the mq notification event arrives, it is mandatory that signals
be blocked. otherwise, a signal can be received, and its handler
executed, in a thread which does not yet exist on the abstract
machine.

after the point of the event arriving, having signals blocked is not a
conformance requirement but a QoI requirement. while the application
can unblock any signals it wants unblocked in the event handler
thread, if they did not start out blocked, it could not block them
without a race window where they are momentarily unblocked, and this
would preclude controlled delivery or other forms of acceptance
(sigwait, etc.) anywhere in the application.

this avoids leaving behind transient resource consumption whose
cleanup is subject to scheduling behavior.

in the error path where the mq_notify syscall fails, the initiating
thread may have closed the socket before the worker thread calls recv
on it. even in the absence of such a race, if the recv call failed,
e.g. due to seccomp policy blocking it, the worker thread could
proceed to close, producing a double-close condition.

this can all be simplified by moving the mq_notify syscall into the
new thread, so that the error case does not require pthread_cancel.
now, the initiating thread only needs to read back the error status
after waiting for the worker thread to consume its arguments.

semaphores are a much lighter primitive, and more idiomatic with
current usage in the code base.

time64 syscall is used only if it's the only one defined for the arch,
or if the requested absolute timeout does not fit in 32 bits. on
current 32-bit archs where time_t is a 32-bit type, this makes it
statically unreachable.

on 64-bit archs, there is no change to the code after preprocessing.
on current 32-bit archs, the timeout is passed via an intermediate
copy to remove the assumption that time_t is a 32-bit type.

to deal with the fact that the public headers may be used with pre-c99
compilers, __restrict is used in place of restrict, and defined
appropriately for any supported compiler. we also avoid the form
[restrict] since older versions of gcc rejected it due to a bug in the
original c99 standard, and instead use the form *restrict.

why did gcc allow this invalid assignment to compile in the first place?