The long double adjustment was wrong:
The usual check is
  mant_bits & 0x7ff == 0x400
before doing a mant_bits++ or mant_bits-- adjustment since
this is the only case when rounding an inexact ld80 into
double can go wrong. (only in nearest rounding mode)

After such a check the ++ and -- is ok (the mantissa will end
in 0x401 or 0x3ff).

fma is a bit different (we need to add 3 numbers with correct
rounding: hi_xy + lo_xy + z so we should survive two roundings
at different places without precision loss)

The adjustment in fma only checks for zero low bits
  mant_bits & 0x3ff == 0
this way the adjusted value is correct when rounded to
double or *less* precision.
(this is an important piece in the fma puzzle)

Unfortunately in this case the -- is not a correct adjustment
because mant_bits might underflow so further checks are needed
and this was the source of the bug.

this is silly, but it makes apps that read binary junk and interpret
it as ld80 "safer", and it gets gnulib to stop replacing printf...

this was fixed previously on i386 but the corresponding code on x86_64
was missed.

backported fix from freebsd:
http://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/base?view=revision&revision=233973

updated nextafter* to use FORCE_EVAL, it can be used in many other
places in the math code to improve readability.

apparently initializing a variable is not "using" it but assigning to
it is "using" it. i don't really like this fix, but it's better than
trying to make a bigger cleanup just before a release, and it should
work fine (tested against nsz's math tests).

make nexttoward, nexttowardf independent of long double representation.
fix nextafterl: it did not raise underflow flag when the result was 0.